Crysis - erstes DX10 game

Zitat von Easyrider16

ich hab ne 7800gt drin

die radeon karten angeglich ende des jahres und die nvidias in ein paar monaten

war ja nur ein scherz

hm, dauert mir eh zu lange, da muss wohl doch noch eine aktuelle als übergangslösung her.

genau das ist ja der punkt. ich glaube eben nicht, dass man einzelne teile (zB blätter) von den bäumen runterschießen kann. ist sicher ein viel größerer mehraufwand an rechenleistung wenn so ein einzelner baum nicht mehr als ganzes angesehen wird.

anyway, das spiel wird auch so sicher großartig

oder habe ich ein video übersehen wo das demonstriert wird?

wirst aber pech haben ati physic funzt nur mit x1x00 aufwerst.

mist @ physiks

und jaja is schon gut Arni

Hier gibt's ein Interview mit Cryteks CEO Cevat Yerli.
[quote]GI: One of the innovations that you’re are making with this genre is the nano-muscle suit. With the suit you’ve got powers such as speed, armor, strength, etc. Having those different powers has to make balancing a tricky issue.

Yerli: Yes, particularly because of multiplayer and single player. It has to do both. That’s the other thing. It’s a hell of a lot of fun in multiplayer already. To be honest, we actually started balancing with multiplayer first because we can test the boundaries better there – and then we give it to single player.

So speed, strength, and armor, or being able to change into any of the tactics, is like a standard toolbox. My vision isn’t always to give the player means and tools to express intelligence over the enemy and the situation – not just be faster in reaction speed. Outsmart the enemy instead of just reacting to the enemy. Outsmarting, for me, is what we can give the player in terms of tools in order for him to do that. So we developed the nano-muscle suit, whose weapon system you can customize.

We developed that to give you speed, strength, armor, and there are updates as well. It’s all for expressing your intelligence and it’s a little more detailed whenever it’s needed from the player’s point of view. Even down to the customizable bullets where you can customize the tactile bullet. You can give it up to four functions, where after you shoot up to four bullets and they stick, you can control their functions. So you can shoot three guys, for example, and then wait until they separate and then put them all asleep at the same time. You can coordinate your tactics that way. In multiplayer you could mark the pilot of the helicopter, wait till he’s in the air with passengers, and then put him to sleep to make them crash land. It’s a standard toolbox. It’s an immersion in gameplay that we have not seen before.

I have already seen things that I had not dreamed of. For example, one guy in testing shot the rotor of the helicopter, which is component damage. What he actually did was mark the rotor and then in the air blew that up. I was like, “How did you do that?” and he said “Well, it’s component damage.” The helicopter has a rotor and a back rotor, and if you destroy those you can actually destroy or manipulate the helicopter remotely.

New gameplay emerges out of these systems. I was running with speed power towards an enemy and shooting and another person came across running as well towards me, and he jumped over me, and in the air increased his strength, landed, and punched me to death. I was like, “%*&# you!” (laughs) It was like life straight out of The Matrix.

Another really cool scenario was when I was in the harbor under the water, and under a boat. I had the pistol, and then switched on speed and literally, like a dolphin, jumped in the air, pow pow pow pow – killed him. He was like, “What the #(*%!” He couldn’t see underwater because of the boat, but I could see him as an enemy on the radar.

This is an aspect that I’m proud of because the systems are working everywhere, and it’s not like it’s a scripted moment or event or just me versus a person or enemy. It’s always fresh. That’s the cool part of it and that’s what I mean when I say I want the player to express his intelligence in ideally the most wide range a shooter can offer.[...]

GI: How scalable is Crysis going to be for lower end PCs? Do you have a low end benchmark right now?

Yerli: We didn’t do a low end benchmark. What we are aiming for is going two years back in the hardware specs, and we will go one and a half years in the future. That literally means we can support the future before its here. We will support two year old hardware in every aspect and make sure it’s available.[/quote]

soweit ichs auf der GC gesehn hab hats mich nicht so von den socken gerissen (gameplay) aber mal abwarten wies ist wenn man wirklich zeit hat und nicht vom eigenen team gekillt wird

finds irgendwie komisch dass ich vom cevat noch nirgends ein interview auf deutsch gelesen hab

he kuhl danke

Crysis Q&A @ CVG.com

Zitat

Do you feel less limited as an artist now that you're using Cry Engine 2?

Khaimzon: It's both more and less limiting. It's more limiting because both our art, our technology and our design are very closely tied together. I mean, it's not the case that the art director can just do whatever he wants; one person does not make a complete decision; so many people and so many things are involved that you have to consider technical parts, design parts and gameplay aspects when you design an element.

From that point of view you have more limits, because you can't just sit there in a vacuum and create any art that you want; "I'm the art director, that's what it's going to look like and that's it," it doesn't work like this. On the other hand the technology allows you to showcase your work much better and everything you do can look much better because of this technology. It's a compromise; a little bit less here but a little bit more here.

Zitat

Crytek's lead artist, Michael Khaimzon, has revealed that the developer could confidently port highly-anticipated PC title Crysis to PS3 and Xbox 360 - although there are no current plans to do so.

Source