"Christmas - the time to fix the computers of your loved ones" « Lord Wyrm

Cheetah 15K.3 vs Atlas 15K

JC 03.10.2003 - 10:01 649 1
Posts

JC

Administrator
Disruptor
Avatar
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Katratzi
Posts: 9067
Review @ The Tech Report
Zitat
If the Atlas 15K and Cheetah 15K.3 were available for the same price, it would be hard to recommend the Cheetah in light of the Atlas 15K's superior all-around performance. However, the 73GB Cheetah 15K.3 retails for $489 online—nearly 15% cheaper than the $575 Atlas 15K. The Cheetah's lower price makes its slightly lower performance in some tests forgivable, and it makes the Cheetah's tie for the lead in IOMeter look much more impressive.

Seagate's value claims for the Cheetah 15K.3 aren't totally out of line. It seems odd to consider a $489 hard drive a low-cost option, but if we consider its IO performance, particularly in IOMeter, the Cheetah's value is hard to ignore. Buying a single Cheetah 15K.3 might feel like splurging, but it's a cheaper option than other alternatives capable of handling similar I/O loads.

So while the Cheetah 15K.3 can't lay claim to the SCSI performance crown, the drive largely equals, and occasionally exceeds, the performance of Maxtor's pricier Atlas 15K. In my book, that's a pretty sweet deal

that

Hoffnungsloser Optimist
Avatar
Registered: Mar 2000
Location: MeidLing
Posts: 11338
Die Atlas mag zwar schneller sein (die Fujitsu MAS sogar noch schneller), aber die Cheetah ist bei weitem die leiseste 15k Platte. Daher bin ich immer noch sehr zufrieden mit der Cheetah in meiner Workstation.
Kontakt | Unser Forum | Über overclockers.at | Impressum | Datenschutz