"Christmas - the time to fix the computers of your loved ones" « Lord Wyrm

Samsung 743B

JC 05.02.2008 - 19:24 2345 2
Posts

JC

Administrator
Disruptor
Avatar
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Katratzi
Posts: 9067
Review @ Techgage
Zitat
click to enlarge
Surprisingly, the monitor performed exceptionally well with image tests. I found very little backlight bleed, and what I did find only affected the extreme top and bottom portions of the display (though they were more pronounced when viewing the screen at different angles). There was very little noticeable banding, which could only be observed by getting extremely close to the screen.

It's my opinion that the 743B may be one of the best pre-configured displays that I have ever seen. The only setting I changed was the brightness, which I lowered to a value of 90. After I had tweaked it, the lights and darks aligned as perfectly as they were going to get, and there was really little else to do overall.

Picture quality is about on par with other comparable LCDs, if not slightly above them. As you may have suspected, I can't say with much confidence that I believe the contrast ratio is truly 7000:1, because the 743B uses a preset-based system (what the call "MagicBright") that adjusts colors to a given task (which include text, internet, sport, movie, dynamic contrast and a custom setting).

[...]'m not so glad about the viewing angles, which are very unforgiving. Looking at the display anywhere other than head-on would result in an immediate loss of clarity. The swivel, tilt and pivoting features of the stand help keep the image centered, but the issue is far from excused because of it. Samsung could have sprung for a slightly better panel for the price, but the industry is already in a give-and-take situation as it is.

Fidel

Here to stay
Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Eisenstadt
Posts: 4519
Warum wird der hier speziell erwähnt? Nur weil er diesen hohen Kontrast hat?

Oder weil es noch Seiten gibt die 17-er testen? :)

that

Hoffnungsloser Optimist
Avatar
Registered: Mar 2000
Location: MeidLing
Posts: 11340
Der Reviewer erwähnt mehrmals, dass der Monitor absolut durchschnittlich ist, bezeichnet einen 5:4 Monitor als 4:3, und erwähnt den Paneltyp nicht einmal.

Hab schon bessere Monitortests gelesen.
Kontakt | Unser Forum | Über overclockers.at | Impressum | Datenschutz