"We are back" « oc.at

LCD-Monitore und ihre "echte" response-time

TOM 21.12.2005 - 17:32 1686 4
Posts

TOM

Elder
Oldschool OC.at'ler
Avatar
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Vienna
Posts: 7431
tft.jpg
Xbitlabs hat acht aktuelle LCD-Monitore etwas genauer unter die Lupe genommen:


Zitat
"...The ISO 13406-2 method to measure the monitor’s response time as the total time necessary to change the state of a pixel from pure black to pure white and back again brings but very little information about the real performance of the monitor and easily misleads the user. Today we are going to reveal all secrets about this parameter and discuss the response time compensation that affects the quality of dynamic images on the screen of 7 monitors from ViewSonic and Samsung..."
Die Testkandidaten waren:
  • Samsung SyncMaster 173P+
  • Samsung SyncMaster 193P+
  • Samsung SyncMaster 970P
  • Samsung SyncMaster 730BF
  • Samsung SyncMaster 930BF
  • Samsung SyncMaster 760BF
  • ViewSonic VX724
  • ViewSonic VX924
Bearbeitet von TOM am 21.12.2005, 17:36

TOM

Elder
Oldschool OC.at'ler
Avatar
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Vienna
Posts: 7431
imho ziemlich ausführlich der artikel... nur ich zähle (mit meinen zugegeben schwachen mathematik-kenntnissen) aber 8 Displays und nicht 7... aber naja... ;)

PIMP

Elder
Elder
Avatar
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Wien ❤️
Posts: 8918
Zitat
LCD Panels with Response Time Compensation: 7 Monitors Reviewed

Probmaker

1.0.0.721
Avatar
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: here
Posts: 5035
trozdem seh ich da auch 8, und nicht 7....

mfg
Probmaker

HVG

Vereinsmitglied
untitled
Avatar
Registered: Jun 2000
Location: NÖ
Posts: 5983
vielleicht fallt der 760bf da raus weil die rtc error rate so hoch is :D
Bearbeitet von HVG am 21.12.2005, 19:38
Kontakt | Unser Forum | Über overclockers.at | Impressum | Datenschutz