First Abit Fatal1ty AA8X/AA8XE Shots
JC 16.08.2004 - 10:05 10907 48
FX Freak
.
|
boah das board ownt einfach extremst hoffentlich kommen dieses jahr noch gscheite cpus
|
starfucker
Schweine an die Macht
|
“Unlimited Overclocking options – users who purchase the Fatal1ty boards can register with ABIT. Upon request, the users will receive a “special” BIOS or unlocking code from ABIT. After the users unlock the code or flash with the special BIOS, they will have unlimited overclocking options for their boards. In another words, higher voltage options and more tweaking and overclocking options will be revealed,” says ABIT’s document, but it does not state directly, which capabilities are likely to be enabled. So far one of the most highly anticipated feature for overclockers has been unlocking multiplier on Intel Pentium 4 chips, which would allow to overclock the CPU and put no additional load on other system components that results from overclocking by increasing processor’s system bus. imo albern
|
~PI-IOENIX~
Pappenschlosser
|
imo albern denk ich auch. siehe av8.
|
masterpain
bofh
|
imo albern da wirste wahrscheilich direkt auf ne liste gesetzt, da brauchst du dein board garnichtmehr einschicken, weil man sich das über(spannungs)bios geflasht hat.
|
Dreamforcer
New world Order
|
|
nfin1te
nuttiest knifenut
|
|
moep
OC Addicted
|
Die MOSFET und RAM-Kühlung finde ich recht w00t - ein ordentlicher Prescott ohne aktiver Luftkühlung (Phase-Change, Wasser) bringt die MOSFETs schon ordentlich zum schmoren.
Und ein Lüfter über den RAMs ist bei Voltages über 3.0V auch recht nützlich.
|
JC
AdministratorDisruptor
|
AnandTech wirf einen ersten Blick auf das Abit Fatal1ty AA8XE. It is hard also to not be impressed by the fact that we reached a new overclocking record FSB with the Fatal1ty board of 323X12. Keep this in perspective, however, as our starting point was 266 and the overclock was really 21%. Tests with the 800FSB Prescott were also impressive, although we could go no further with our 14 multiplier Prescott than we had achieved on the 925X Asus P5AD2 in the past. We are confident that the board can do it; we just couldn't find a Prescott with multipliers lower than 14.
We have already seen a few incredible overclocks with water and phase-change cooling with the new 3.46EE. For those inclined to use more exotic cooling, this board would be a great choice for your P4 system. But CPU blocks may be a challenge with the good-looking, but constricting, OTES cooling shroud.
In addition, the Abit Fatal1ty is undeniably impressive in the "looks" department. Owners will get lots of "wows" with the red backlighting. The board certainly looks the part of the best gaming board that you can buy. We would even be inclined to say that Fatal1ty could well be the best INTEL gaming board which you can currently buy, as it's extremely flexible and stable. If you insist on an Intel board for your gaming rig, this is certainly one you need to consider. But that is where our praise would end.
|
FX Freak
.
|
hehe, die ramkühlung ownt hoffentlich bringen sie so ein board auch für s939
|
BigJuri
Reservoir Dog
|
Die Ramkühlung ownt ganz sicher... jede Flugzeugturbine. Warum Abit immer öfter auf die Idee verfällt, jede Menge 40mm Lüfter auf ihre Boards zu packen. (Stichwort: Dual-OTES)
|
majordomus
GEFREITER
|
Die Ramkühlung ownt ganz sicher... jede Flugzeugturbine. Warum Abit immer öfter auf die Idee verfällt, jede Menge 40mm Lüfter auf ihre Boards zu packen. (Stichwort: Dual-OTES) aktive mosfetkühlung (otes bei abit) wird von intel für die mobos empfohlen!!!
|
Nibbler
OC Addicted
|
|
Kingping
...
|
so a prolo board. ^^ aber die review klingt ziemlich nett. es is halt leider für die "falsche" plattform. vlt kommt ja noch fatal1ty board für s939, aber dazu müsst fata mal wieder was gwinnen, sonst wird das nix. das abit letzens 150.000$ an den japsen zahlen musste, der ihn besiegt hat, hat ihnen sicher ned geschmeckt.
Bearbeitet von Kingping am 11.11.2004, 17:48
|
FX Freak
.
|
schau auf xs.org AN8 Fatal1ty kommt
|
Kingping
...
|
Bearbeitet von Kingping am 12.11.2004, 07:40
|