URL: https://www.overclockers.at/storage-memory/maxtor_dm10_vs_seagate_7200_8_135868/page_1 - zur Vollversion wechseln!
ZitatBetween the two 300 GB NCQ-enabled drives we’ve looked at today, the Maxtor DiamondMax 10 and the Seagate Barracuda 7200.8, it is very clear to us that Maxtor simply has a better all-around product. The DiamondMax 10 showed better performance across the board, runs noticeably quieter, and costs anywhere between 5-10% less compared to the Barracuda 7200.8. That’s a pretty clean sweep, in our books.
[...]
The Seagate Barracuda 7200.8, unfortunately, is somewhat disappointing to us. While the drive performs fairly well, only about 5-10% slower compared to our DiamondMax 10, there are no killer features here which elevate the 7200.8 over Seagate’s previous generation drives. The drive still just performs “ok”, and was audible louder during testing compared to the DiamondMax 10. While the drive does boast a terrific five year warranty, it can’t make up for the fact that the drive runs louder, slower, and is more expensive compared to the DiamondMax 10.
kein einziger anwendungsbenchmark drinnen...
nur da Atto aber in ermangelung vo Zahlen ned genau zu vergleichen.
Also das mit Idle kann ich bestätigen, das mit den Read/Write Operationen und unhörbar leise nicht. Zumindest bei meiner DM10 hört man ganz deutlich wenn zugegriffen wird ...ZitatMaxtor rates the DiamondMax 10 300GB at 27 dBA idle (compared to 28 dBA of the Seagate). While we could tell no difference between idle noise levels (both basically inaudible to our ears), seek and write levels were much better for the Maxtor. I doubt that most, even the most noise-sensitive users, would be able to hear the DiamondMax 10 in a closed case environment.
also meien Maxtor 9 is wesentlich lauter als meine 7200.7
Idle wie auch beim zugriff.
würde mich wundenr wenn die seagate jetzt so laut geworden wäre
overclockers.at v4.thecommunity
© all rights reserved by overclockers.at 2000-2024